“We’re Here/We’re Queer/We’re Fabulous/Don’t Fuck with Us” was a chant heard on the Trinity College quad Tuesday afternoon. A few hundred students, faculty, and staff wearing neon green ribbons gathered in front of Mather Hall at noon to demand a Zero Tolerance policy for those committing acts of bigotry on campus. This protest was called in response to a series of hate crimes on the Trinity College campus. Most recently, a Latino Trinity student, according to a report in the Hartford Courant, was told to get off the campus by a white student. The Latino student was reportedly called a “nigger” after having a beer launched at his car. This was noted as the third reported racist incident on campus in approximately one month.
At Tuesday’s protest, a number of students held signs and wore name tags announcing who they were, that they were students, and that they were not to be referred to by various hate slurs. Before marching to the Dean of Students’ office and other locations on campus, several students and a professor spoke to the crowd. The professor said “we demand to live in a culture that is civilized.” A student speaker called for the isolation of those who commit hate crimes, explaining, “they divide our community […] they create an environment of fear.” Though recent incidents have been racially-based, current students and alumni have indicated that the atmosphere is also anti-gay and anti-female. Another speaker said that “racism, homophobia, and all other forms of bigotry” are “unbecoming to a Trinity student,” and that students would no longer accept what she called “slaps on wrist” punishment from the administration.
While at the college, I noted the irony. I, a member of the community, who has never been a Trinity student or faculty member, rode my bicycle onto campus and received not so much as a raised eyebrow. I rode past a group of female students who were lamenting that the campus is not gated, but the remark was not directed at me. Nobody threw a beer can at me. Nobody called me names. Nobody told me to leave, let alone ask what I was doing there. I had no media identification on me and there was nothing about my presence (bookbag, gradebook, ID) that would have led someone to believe I actually belonged there. Yet there is a clear anti-Hartford attitude among many of the students. One need not listen too hard or read too many comments on articles to see how the neighborhood around the college is regarded; I am a member of that feared community, and yet because of my appearance, I was able to bike and walk around without hassle. This has been the case each time I have appeared on that campus.
Today’s newspaper article alludes to several other incidents that have occurred on that campus; the conclusion one should not reach is that Trinity College is an island of racism: the students who are lashing out are mere byproducts of a larger hate-filled society. Another article from today indicates a sharp increase in discrimination complaints filed with the EEOC. Here’s a thought: tie the two stories together. The people today throwing objects at others who are seen as outsiders will be those causing problems in the workforce tomorrow, if their actions and attitudes are allowed to go unchecked. It needs to be said that the students causing problems at Trinity College (and at various colleges across the nation) do not magically turn into bigots when they step onto campus; such belief systems develop throughout their lifetimes. Whether they are allowed to continue on that path can largely be determined by the environment fostered on campuses, in the workplace, and elsewhere in society. When individuals committing offensive acts receive severe repercussions — like expulsion or job loss –such behaviors will change.
While these recent reported crimes and incidents occurred on the Trinity College campus, such offensive behavior permeates our society. Yesterday afternoon, I was witness to a young male standing in front of the Hartford Public Library, yelling at another male: “that’s why you’re HIV positive.” It was loud enough for everyone on that block to hear.
Today, students in the public schools are bullied based on (real or perceived) race, ethnicity, sexuality, and academic achievement. Repeatedly, I hear from parents that the schools’ administrations do nothing substantial to punish offenders nor to change the climate of the school so that future incidents do not occur.
Walk by teenagers or young adults and you will likely hear words like “faggot” and “retard” used incessantly. Even adults who have reached the age of “should definitely know better” weave such words into their everyday language. There are some who, on the radio, have referred to Mayor Segarra using the term pato, and others who attempt to make an issue out of his sexuality for political gain. If grown adults are modeling these behaviors, is it any wonder when youth begin to replicate them?
From a few years back, you might recall some UConn law students taking part in a “Bullets and Bubbly” party which consisted of participants dressing according to racial stereotypes. Future lawyers.
No, this is not a problem contained on the Trinity campus; it’s everywhere and it is intolerable.
Note: I debated with myself for hours whether to abbreviate the hateful slurs or whether to spell them out, as they have been used. They are ugly words and I think that by dancing around what exactly is being used to hurt others, we are actually distancing ourselves from just how harmful and hateful they happen to be. I do not like them up on my blog and I hope never to have occasion to publish them here again.
UPDATE 5:21pm: The Dean of Students at Trinity College issued an email about ten minutes ago that states the following:
The Dean of Students Office and the SGA have agreed to work through the Campus Climate Committee to create a new policy on bias-related harassment that is more explicit in conveying that the College community does not tolerate such acts and that individuals who are found by the College judicial process to have committed targeted acts of harassment based on race, sexual identity, gender, or other forms of bias will face serious consequences up to and including expulsion from the College.We invite all members of the community to contact Leslie James, Vice President of Multicultural Affairs Council (leslie.james@trincoll.edu) and Chaplain Read, Co-Chair of the Campus Climate Committee (allison.read@trincoll.edu) with ideas, sample policies from other institutions, or any other suggestions.
Karen
Trinity is a school where students only give lip service to the ideals of equality. Until the college makes greater strides in fostering academia over social life (which it only started to do after The President Who Shall Not Be Named But Moved to Hawaii left), it cannot compete in a manner affording it the ability to draw the types of students who want to change the campus attitude. During my last year, 1999, the college had several bigotry based episodes of violence that were swept under the table. If students, as a whole, are unaware of what goes on and how often? How can they even know they want to make changes?
A search on the Tripod website for “racism on campus” gives 11 results between 2002 and 2011. This means that there are 1.2 articles per year about an issue that affects at minimum 23% of the students on campus, according to the statistic on the Admissions website regarding students of color at Trinity. There is one article from 4/26/11 that discusses “bigotry on campus” and ten articles come from a search for “homophobia on campus” between 2004 and 2011. Of those ten articles, one is a crossover from the “racism on campus” article and one is about how for once Trinity is not in the news for homophobia on campus, but for excessive drinking. There’s a win.
To change the climate, students need to be aware. Maybe a lot of students don’t read the Tripod. Maybe it’s nothing but a voice piece for the next aspiring Tom Brokaw or Katie Couric. However, if it is the stand alone presentation of editorial and news on campus, the dearth of articles regarding something that is as pervasive today as it was 11 years ago means that the culture has not changed because those who call attention to campus issues do not want to bring about change.
In fact, if Trinity students as a whole want to make a change – the climate can start with those present the news. The article about the rally is listed under Opinions and is listed second to an interview (from today) with a JJ about studying abroad. Apparently, the Tripod editors feel that a discussion of the importance of studying abroad is more relevant to the interests of their community than an editorial about bigotry and violence on their campus.
Where can the culture start to change? With those who provide information to the student body.
Damian
Karen, if you do think the college needs to foster academia over social life, then why take issue with the editors at the Tripod for giving precedence to an interview about academia?
In its own way that interview is about recognizing one’s unexamined bigotry and transforming beyond it.
It wasn’t really a fluff piece. It suggested a way of changing the individual student, and perhaps, thus, the wider culture.
Would students’ awareness of bigotry-based episodes of violence, by itself, really foster a desire to make changes? The other ‘Most Popular’ opinion piece -after the bigotry editorial- is about the prevalence of student apathy. Not only apathy, but the writer suggests that willful, passive avoidance is an expected reaction by students to mandatory stimulation. So, according to that opinion, awareness by itself does not necessarily lead to action, nor even does forced action lead to action.
So, after all that, I think it’s worth asking again, where can the culture start to change?
Barney White
Karen, the problem is that the Trinity Tripod essentially validates the status quo and has done so as long as this correspondent can remember. Beneath the surface, one can readily discern in every issue the sorts of insinuations and implications that in fact bolster a fundamentally racist mindset.
Gaspar Sancoche
Your comment about your biking onto campus is spot-on. Yet Gaspar has overheard professors and students on this campus refer to Hispanic people biking on campus as “gang members”simply because they appear to be Hispanic. Appologies, Gaspar should stick to writing about food and restaurants. But he could not help himself. He was there today at the rally…
Julie Beman
Wow.
We were having the same protests 26 years ago.
I can speak most authentically about the treatment of women.
I have a number of pretty horrifying stories to tell, but I’ll just share info about the “Pledge Project.”
The “Pledge Project” was a lovely “tradition” where a fraternity identified a first year female student with whom *all* of members of that pledge class were to “have sex.”
One of my roommates was selected to be that woman by one of the more exclusive fraternities. It was awful.
I sincerely hope that “tradition” has been abolished since fraternities were required to go co-ed, and that the “tradition” hasn’t gone co-ed itself.
Julie Beman
The sight of the young women holding the signs stating that they’re qualified Trinity students is disturbing to me in a way that I can’t quite name, and it doesn’t have to do with the patently disturbing fact that they have to carry them in the first place.
I…it…is it…hmmm…
OK. So there’s Trinity, sitting proudly at the edge of Frog Hollow. As we all know, duh, there’s a large Hispanic population in Frog Hollow. Which means, perhaps, that a person of Hispanic ethnicity might walk onto the Trinity campus.
As you said, Kerri, you were able to walk around campus with no problem. No one questioned you based on your appearance, even though you live in the surrounding neighborhood.
I just have this creepy image of the students carrying their signs all the time, in order to distance themselves from the surrounding population.
I guess what I’m wondering is, is this about being accepted at Trinity? Or is this about living in a world that accepts everyone?
I guess I’m afraid that this is about being accepted at Trinity, and the world that Trinity represents.
Julie Beman
And also…I recall protests run by African American and West Indian students at Trinity that made me feel off-balance in some ways because many of these students were from incredibly privileged families (I knew only two students from Hartford).
I’m not trying to start something. I don’t deny that racism exists. What I’m saying is: race, ethnicity, sex, sexual orientation…CLASS.
Maurice Wade
Way back in the mid 80s in response to some sort of incident, I suggested (only half seriously) that the College give black faculty members badges saying “Official Trinity Negro” so that folks would not think that we were somehow interlopers on the campus.
Julie Beman
Ugh. Professor Wade, that’s horrible. Is your perception that things are still that way for black faculty members, or do you think/feel that things have changed?
So you’re an ethics and public policy guy…what do you think it going on in the world that’s causing what seems to be a backslide in our ability to be civil? Is it the the economy? Plain old fear of difference? The shrinking world? Or have I just been living in a bubble of multicultural civility, and only now realizing that things haven’t changed at all since 1985?
Kerri Provost
Thanks to the Trinity alumni for commenting here and providing some perspective about how long this/these problem(s) have been happening.