I guess not everyone is a fan of the incoming Frog Hollow roundabout. Or, perhaps this was a statement about the DOT’s attitude toward vulnerable road users in general. The roundabout may be a massive improvement for walkers, but for cyclists, not so much. It’s mind-boggling how with an opportunity to fix longstanding mistakes, the DOT opted to include overly wide car lanes and exclude bicycle lanes from the design; however, this is hardly the only place where the DOT shows up as negligent.
Take a look at many segments of interstate, for instance. You will find places where a person is unable to pull a disabled vehicle off the roadway, increasing the odds that the vehicle and/or its occupants wind up being struck by motorists traveling at highway speeds. A driver struck three people on I-91 in Wethersfield over the weekend, killing two of them. They were out of a vehicle and in the roadway following a previous crash. (You can view an image of that crash site here)
I could go on and on about how the way to make Connecticut’s streets safer is through improved infrastructure, but I have a record of doing that already.
As far as I know, this message went live on Friday and was changed back to the pre-approved text on Monday.
Richard Nelson
Thank you for posting this. Art that is right up my alley. Does DOT and those in power ever listen to the people who study this or do they think “We know it all,” with their college educated BS folks? Listen DOT, to the walkers, those who ride their bikes, to the people of the neighborhood. You do not know, this is obvious or this article would not have to be written.
Thanks Kerri for the work you are doing on this subject. You know what it means to a lot of us.
Kerri Provost
If I made the sign, it would’ve said something like “Welcome to the bicycle & pedestrian only road” and just declared this a car-free area. But I have no idea how to change signs and am too verbose to get what I want to say to fit with limited characters.
Lauren
Whoever programmed that message is my new hero.