Would we even recognize Election Day in Hartford if it weren’t for the near-ritual of shenanigans?
As of mid-afternoon, CT News Junkie reported a low, even by our standards, voter turnout of 2.2% in the city. This number may deceive one into believing that each voter’s experience would be positive, as there’d be no rushing folks away from the voting tables and out the door.
Julie Beman, a West End resident, reports that she will be filing a complaint with the State Elections Enforcement Commission (SEEC) after her experience on Tuesday. She began by going to the District 4 polling place at the Hartford Seminary, which she said she can see from her living room. She received a voter confirmation card in the mail stating her voting location and, she said, she went online Monday night to confirm the location.
When she arrived, the moderator told her that nobody on Fern Street votes at this location. So, Beman reported to the United Methodist Church, where District 5 votes. Here, she was told that her address was not on the list. She had them check to see if she was still listed under her previous West End address. Neither appeared.
From there, Beman was sent to the library to register to vote.
Many people would have abandoned this mission, but Beman said her drive to vote for a Board of Education member, combined with her unemployment, let her pursue this longer.
Once at the Hartford Public Library, she tried to register. This is when she was informed that she was registered to vote in District 4 — Hartford Seminary. It was suggested she go across the street to the Registrar of Voters in City Hall in order to straighten this all out.
She spoke with Olga Vázquez, the Democratic Registrar of Voters, and it seemed that the matter was going to get some resolution. Vázquez called up the District 4 moderators and reminded them, albeit in a tone that sounded to Beman like “verbal sparring,” how to check for voters’ addresses; the moderators were told to call the RoV if there are issues, rather than just send voters elsewhere. Beman was given a stamped affidavit to present at District 4 and thought she was one her way.
Then, she had one more question: is there a detailed summary of the ballot questions available?
After being handed this information, Beman says that the Democratic Registrar of Voters overstepped boundaries by giving opinionated and inaccurate verbal summaries of the ballot questions, implying that the number of RoVs would be reduced, while others in City Hall would get raises. Beman says that Vázquez pointed to the two ballot questions that could directly impact the RoV and suggested which way to vote on them.
Vázquez, when asked by Real Hartford for her explanation, denied this, saying: “I didn’t suggest how people should be voting.” Asked again if he provided any verbal interpretation of the ballot questions, Vázquez said “I read exactly what the text was saying.”
In the end, Beman got to vote, but she wonders how many others from her street were turned away and ultimately unable to vote because their schedules were more full than hers at the moment.
The SEEC is investigating the Hartford Registrar of Voters already due to complaints filed following the 2012 election; voters claim that write-in votes were not properly counted and recorded.
Rachel Sclare
While at District 5 this morning, I observed confusion about people who live on Fern St. they were being told to go to the Seminary (District 4), but then calls were made. It had not been resolved by the time I finished voting.
The man checking in ahead of me had just registered the day before, his circumstance also necessitated a phone call, and was not resolved by the time I finished voting.
When I started to check in one of the volunteers standing there began to suggest that maybe I was supposed to be at the Seminary as the districts had changed. I told him that I used to vote at the Seminary, but had been redistricted to the church and had voted at the church last time. Meanwhile the woman checking me in found my name and address on the list.
On to the voting…
I couldn’t vote on any of the ballot questions as this was the first I had even heard about them, and the language on the form didn’t give any information. I looked around to see if anything was posted (I recall in the past that there were posters), there was nothing. I didn’t know I could ask for details – although it seems there wouldn’t have been anything there. I wasn’t going to vote when I had no idea what they were about.
Kerri Provost
The detailed descriptions apparently did not make it to the polls until mid-morning, which is not helpful to those who voted (or tried to) earlier in the day.
The Courant reports that the RoV’s says they did not receive the ballot explanations until yesterday. No word on why the RoV wasn’t proactive in getting those materials sooner since that was available for weeks.
Lucas Karmazinas
The comment in the Courant piece noting that the ROV didn’t received an official copy of the explanatory text from the City set me off. This sounds like a failure on the part of both parties but what the heck is the ROV doing with their time and why were they not proactive in getting the materials out to the public! In an otherwise quiet election cycle this is a pretty glaring failure and should be addressed.
Richard
They are so filled with excuses. The simple fact is they just do not do their jobs as they should. As someone close in city hall said , those two just want their fat paychecks.Yes why weren’t they proactive? Someone who bothered to vote yesterday should have the SEEC look into this.
Julie Beman
I’d like to clarify that I didn’t ask for the summary of the referendum items.
Ms. Vázquez went to a bulletin board, pulled off the detailed summary and handed them to me. She then started explaining what they were.
Julie Beman
To clarify my own grammar:
Ms. Vázquez went to a bulletin board, pulled off the detailed summary, and handed it to me. She then started explaining the ballot items.
ELIZABETH DAVIS
You are hereby declared Uber-Grammarphile as you have made the above effort while wielding the tools of Bureaucracy/Incompetence Slayer.
Richard
Yes we are still waiting for our votes to be counted. But a little bird told me that we will be very please with the ruling and that it will be announced next month. We are keeping our fingers crossed that SEEC recommends the current HROV removal from office. What you experienced today is just a tip of the iceberg of what we have put up with in 2010 and 2012 with the democrat and working family party ROV. We have never met such hostile public servants before who are not doing their jobs and make a mockery out of the voting process in Hartford.
Yes Julie please file a complaint. Our nephew is filing one also as he had problems where he goes to vote. Something has to be done.
Real Hartford » Unofficial Election Results Show No Surprises
[…] promoted; the event was not listed on the venue’s website. We received reports yesterday that a person working at City Hall was allegedly part of the problem of misinformation. Few knew that ‘yes’ votes on two of the ballot questions would change nothing unless […]
Jim
Appropriate that, after another disastrous performance by the Registrars of Voters, question three was the one ballot measure to pass. Here’s hoping that the state legislature makes the changes necessary to allow Hartford to professionalize that office.
Adam P
I had a minor hitch in which I was still registered at my old address (my own fault). I went to the voter registration table at the Library and explained the situation. They told me to just go to the polling place for my NEW address and show my ID. At the polling place they asked me to fill out a form to update my address and called City Hall for guidance. It took maybe fifteen minutes and I was able to vote.
My one concern was that when they decided to accept my new address form, the person at the polling center said, “Okay, we’re allowing you to vote today.”
No, you’re not ALLOWING me to vote. I have concerns about that language and the power structure that it suggests. Is this important enough to bring a comment of some sort to City Hall?