Toni Gold, resident and one of the panelists at this morning’s forum on transportation, commented that the POCD must be less timid and more aggressive if it is to be successful. The packed house of audience participants seemed to agree with her.
After some introductory comments from Chief Operating Officer David Panagore and a presentation overview by Director of Planning, Roger J. O’Brien, the four member panel delivered brief comments regarding what their priorities would be for the transportation aspect of the Plan of Conservation and Development. In addition to Toni Gold, the audience in Union Station heard from Jim Redeker (Bureau Chief of the Connecticut Department of Transportation), Tom Maziarz (Director of Transportation Planning at CRCOG), and Anne I. Hayes (President of the Central Connecticut Bicycle Alliance and Director of Parking and Mass Transit at The Travelers).
Redeker and Maziarz echoed each other that the top two priority items should be the New Britain-Hartford Busway and the New Haven-Hartford-Springfield Commuter Rail. Maziarz said that the New Britain-Hartford Busway is “critical” in terms of regional labor market access, whereas the rail project would help connect the city to the global economy. He suggested that a suffering state economy is due in part to the failing transportation system currently in place. Redeker explained that there is a need to link environmental (climate change) and transportation for a few reasons including that doing so will help to secure federal funding of projects.
Hayes, through her work with the Travelers, shared that some 25% of its downtown employees take the bus. In her professional position, she explained that she promotes transportation choices. She urged the City to consider requiring businesses to include bicycle parking alongside any automobile parking. Hayes added that for some, biking is the only affordable means of transportation. The POCD should prioritize alternative transportation over the automobile, she said.
Gold, whose comments started the panel portion of the forum, demanded that pedestrians be given primary importance. She linked the rise of automobile dependency with the “fifty years of death spiral” that Hartford and other urban areas have been experiencing. As Heather Brandon of Urban Compass tweeted from the forum, “Since 1960 downtown Hartford has seen a 300% increase in dedicated land for parking. In same time city saw 60% drop in residents.” Gold said that the plan needs to acknowledge “damage that has been done by the automobile.” She pushed for an increase in sidewalk size, reduction in vehicle lanes, addition of roundabouts, addition of angled parking, reduction or elimination of private vehicles on Main Street from South Green up to Albany Avenue, and “no more publicly funded parking garages.”
Gold’s comments, while sounding initially ambitious, matched the sentiments of the public who discussed these issues in small groups. During the last POCD (1997), the city’s priorities seemed to be in a different place. Then, there was a call for more parking. Today, some participants expressed the desire to not only stop expanding parking, but to get rid of some of the parking structures altogether. The argument was that if people could not park with such ease, they would be forced into using alternative means of transportation, thus reducing traffic congestion and the environmental burden. Participants discussed the need to reduce automobile reliance and improve intermodal transportation. A few people remarked on the need to expand the hours that city buses run, as people wishing to support the arts and entertainment venues can get to them, but are then left with no way to return home if the event continues late into the evening. Repeatedly the issue of pedestrian and cyclist safety was raised. A few were concerned that even with an increase in transportation options, people would be hesitant or refuse to use them if they perceived Hartford as being unsafe. Others described need for a citywide vision; there have been reports of inconsistent responses to issues like speeding. In the small group discussion, Brandon explained that some streets have been equipped with speed bumps, while residents on other streets have been told that speed bumps would impede emergency vehicles. She noted that her street, which has speed bumps, receives regular traffic from emergency vehicles, so this reasoning has not been applied consistently. She added that such piecemeal decisions are often political, and results are achieved based on who someone knows. At the end of the meeting, participants were given three stickers so that they could vote on the items they found to be the most important of all that were listed during the small group brainstorming sessions.
In the POCD literature, the City explains that the POCD “is a guideline for asking the right questions, identifying challenges, determining resolutions and implementing strategies.” To achieve the various transportation goals, they list the following as possible points to discuss:
- Provide a seamless pedestrian transportation system that enables bicycling and walking, connecting origins and destinations, and effectively linking to the public transportation system within Hartford and the larger region.
- Pursue the development of various trails and greenways around the City, with an emphasis on creating linkages with regional and national trail systems, and with connecting Hartford neighborhoods and residents with employment centers, shopping center[s], and parks both in Hartford and in the surrounding communities.
- Leverage the East Coast Greenway (ECG) along the South and North Branches of the Park River and Hartford’s Riverfront to connect key links in and around Hartford.
- Develop appropriate bicycle infrastructure (bike lanes, bike shoulders, wide curb lanes, or parallel multi-use paths) along major commuter routes, commercial and employment centers and transportation hubs.
- Improve pedestrian connections
- Promote mass transit and Union New Station as the HUB of the City’s transit system.
- Develop urban commercial centers into transit activity. Transit stops should be intense activity areas.
- Work collaboratively with neighboring cities and towns, the Capitol Region Council of Governments and the State of Connecticut to evaluate and develop other regional mass transit systems.
- Encourage carpooling among employees in the Downtown area by offering discounted parking rates for multiple occupant vehicles at Hartford Parking Authority facilities.
- Explore the creative use of car-sharing programs such as Zipcar.
- Evaluate the synchronization of traffic signals in the City. Make improvements where necessary to reduce the number of intersections where vehicles are forced to idle for extended periods of time.
- Employ access management tools to promote traffic safety and maintain the “carrying capacity” of Hartford’s arterial streets.
- Review one-way street patterns to improve connectivity.
- Encourage the use of alternative modes of transportation including mass transit, pedestrian and bicycle. Encourage car pooling and rideshare programs during peak commuter times.
- Improve vehicular and pedestrian circulation around Union Station. Several of the major local roadways leading into the Union Station area have design, circulation and traffic congestion conditions that impede the development of Union Station as a convenient multimodal transportation hub.
- Connect Hartford’s Downtown to activity centers, urban neighborhoods as well as surrounding communities
- Centralize the public transportation system around Union Station, creating a multi-modal transit center that includes supportive transit-oriented mixed use development.
- Continue to support and promote the development of the New Haven-Hartford-Springfield commuter rail service and the Hartford-New Britain Busway.
Not all of the aforementioned points were discussed.
The theme panels will wrap up December 8th. The Planning & Zoning Commission will hold public listening sessions in January and February 2010, after which the City Council and CRCOG will review the draft. Formal PZC public hearings will begin in April. May 2010 is when the POCD should be adopted by the PZC.
The final two One City, One Plan meetings will be held December 1st & 8th from 6-8:30pm. The one on December 1st will be held at 85 Sigourney Street and will discuss advancing Downtown as the region’s center of commerce, culture and city living; the meeting on December 8th will be held at the CT Science Center to “Promote & Encourage the Integration of Sustainable Practices.”
Heather Brandon
Thanks for this thorough write-up!
Below is a link to some photos from two of the meetings. The set includes shots of notes each group generated showing the vote-by-sticky-note system we were encouraged to use.
http://bit.ly/85AwYV
kerri provost
Thanks for the link and for taking pics! I forgot my camera this morning.
Kyle
Thanks, Kerri! I had to leave before the small groups, so I didn’t get to discuss the implications of aggressively reducing the parking and other auto-centric features of Downtown.
The positions advanced during the panel discussion seemed to be so anti-car that I worry we would make it too difficult for employees to get to work downtown. I think it’s important to recognize that Hartford needs to attract and retain businesses (in addition to residents) in the Downtown neighborhood. Our best opportunity for growing the revenue side of our City income statement is by building up the Downtown business district. Will businesses buy into that vision if they are concerned about their employees’ ability to get to work?
There are major opportunities to improve the parking situation downtown, especially since there are so many surface lots. It seems to me that we should actually be looking to build more garages so that the surface lots can be transformed to better contribute to the neighborhood. Perhaps the parking garages should be concentrated near the highway exit ramps, so that the cars don’t need to drive through the heart of Downtown, but it seems clear to me that parking is needed to support Downtown Hartford.
Was this concern raised later in the meeting? How did (or would) the anti-car folks respond?
kerri provost
I do not know what happened during the discussion period for all small groups, but when people came back together, I did not remember hearing anyone speak against the idea of prioritizing other forms of transportation. Perhaps there was some dissent during the smaller group talks.
One thing that I forgot to mention was that there was concern about pedestrian safety stemming from concern for the elderly who may not be able to drive anymore, or who are too scared/nervous/aggravated by driving. Also, in my group, one woman mentioned that she wanted trolleys to come back because she felt “nostalgic” about them.
Richard
Kerri great report!
Let us all hope that the horse will take a drink when it is led to water. Suppose if it gets thristy enough it will. It is going to be a hard job to get people out of their cars how many amongst us really believe that goal can be accomplished? And how will that be accomplished?
I hope that when the powers that be start the synchronization of the traffic signals they will find a sweet slow moving older person to cross at the walk light and then go from there. Remember it is the least amongst us that we must first be concerned with. Many of us can’t even make it across the street now. Don’t let them mess with us any more.
I like where Toni Gold is going with her ideas. Heather is so correct. It has been for years a running joke that this city is very good at knocking down buildings for parking lots. One thing in our favor is that most business charge employees for parking.
I do hope that before anything is put into practice concerning the bus system in this city that those who ride the bus All THE TIME, are consulted. City officals, out of towners, do-gooders etc, if you don’t use the bus M-S as your only mode of transportation please don’t take over the conversation. Go to the people for this. Do not tell us what we need or where we should get on and off the bus!
How about a tax? Yeah!!! A tax. A tax on anyone driving into the city. If you come driving into the city you have to pay $10.00. When I get to be ruler I will charge more as I hate cars.
All of this sounds wonderful, keeps everyone busy and out of trouble, greases the wheels of folks brains, puts some money in some pockets (another story who is building all of this?Can we call for a WPA?), and makes us all think that we really do have a say in this top down capitalist demockracy.
Next a let’s talk about the waste concerning the star shuttle. Very few people use that and it goes around and around and around all day and into the night. Who was the brains behind that joke? After 30 years living here in Hartford I find most of these commissions, public hearings, etc to be a joke. Who makes up this PODC?
kerri provost
Richard, here is the POCD link: http://www.hartford.gov/Development/planning/POCD/POCD.aspx
Councilpersons Deutsch and Cotto were in attendance at yesterday’s discussion. I do not know who else from the City Council has attended previous meetings.
I don’t believe the Star Shuttle came up at all during the discussion.
Richard
Good for Larry and Luis. We can thank our lucky stars for those two guys. I only mentioned the Star Shuttle as it seems like a silly waste. But perhaps it could be put to use as a shuttle if parking garages were on the out skirts of town. Since it just goes around and around it might as well do something.
It’s the one to a car driving that really gets my goat. It is done everywhere and with all sorts of excuses that I really don’t have any idea on how to unwind that tangled ball of yarn short of a fascist takeover or everyone coughing and choking to death.
Kyle don’t we have enough parking now? What are your reasons to call for more? Where do we need parking and for what reason? Considering that downtown empties out after 5 it wouldn’t seem likely we need more unless there is parking garage for every building that hosts an event so those who come into town won’t have to get their feet wet or meet up with a homeless pandhandler or whatever evils they believe lurk on every street corner. (oh, sorry that is another discussion.)
What would we use the surface lots for? Building more empty retail space, more “build it they will come,” more someday soon, more high price housing that no one wants. We know that the powers that be don’t want low or moderate priced housing downtown so whose playground are we cartering too?
On the weekend the buses do stop rather early so many of us who do not drive have to tailor our event attending to when is the last bus and how long will the wait be or how early do we have to leave the performance.If we don’t like the conclusions then we pay for a taxi home or just walk. But I don’t think that CT. Transit will put more buses on the schedule unless there is a real need. Weekdays the last bus out of downtown is 12:45 so that is pretty good for a ghost town pretending to be an arts and entertainment city. And who is on the bus? Workers! Janitors, security guards, cooks, dishwashers,waiters and waitresses,clerks, nurses, hospital workers and mothers with children and other folks returning home. I never see the arty types but I do hope to see them.
Sorry I went over with the words Kerri.
Kyle
Richard, just a few comments to follow up.
I’m imagining a future for Hartford in which we have a vibrant Downtown neighborhood buzzing with residents, workers, students, and visitors. We clearly have not achieved a critical mass yet, and need additional development to reach the goal. To borrow one of your phrases, I actually don’t care whose “playground” it is, just that it actually is a “playground” … that there are people downtown.
Auto transit is the most common way people currently get downtown, therefore we need a strategy to manage the cars. What I heard at the meeting was that cars should be a distant third priority in the forward-looking plan behind pedestrians and bicycles. There was strong applause/support for measures that would make it more difficult for autos to navigate downtown, like narrower streets, non-synchronized lights, and significantly less parking, among other suggestions. You seem to support these ideas, and also propose a tax on those who drive downtown.
So you’re just the person to answer my initial question … are you concerned about the reaction of businesses to some of these suggestions? What would you say to a large employer currently located downtown that argued against the proposals because they make it more difficult and more expensive for their employees to get to work?
Richard
Kyle
I don’t think that I am the person to answer your questions. Any answers must come from the “people,” not a committee, or a few who know about the committee’s meetings and have the opportunity to attend. The “people” yes, must include the businesses which operate downtown. A large part of the answer must come from those who drive cars changing their minds about driving; here let me add one to a car, into the city. Nothing will ever happen until that process is begun and completed. As I said before
“It’s the one to a car driving that really gets my goat. It is done everywhere and with all sorts of excuses that I really don’t have any idea on how to unwind that tangled ball of yarn short of a fascist takeover or everyone coughing and choking to death.”
Either people will be forced to change their habits by rule and law, or we will be forced to by other reasons. It can not continue to be that little Sassy in the suburbs has to get to her soccer game so mommy can’t possibly ride the bus to work but must drive one to a car. Mommy and little Sassy must understand that their thing is not really a priority. The welfare of our city and the planet is.
I fully agree we need a strategy to manage cars downtown. My goodness we all agree on that. That would be my first priority if I am limiting myself to downtown. Since that is the reality and that reality is not going away soon. I think people like their cars just as much as their private parts. But we can not just ban all cars from Main Street without a real plan in place. Making it more difficult for cars to navigate downtown is not the answer until one has replaced the need to even bring the car into town in the first place.
I did not attend the meeting so I can not measure the reactions of the people, or looking over the crowd get a reading on where they all were really coming from, or following everyone to the parking garage and see what type of vehicle they are driving, etc. In other words for myself my radar was not in operation at that meeting to separate the blow hard me mes from the real deal. Again I will go back to most of these types of meetings and committees are just a front to make people think they are doing something to change something in this top down capitalist demockracy.
Since people are not going to give up driving one to a car, (that would be a tax I was proposing tongue in cheek) then yes I agree with you. Let’s put the garages on the city limits. Things like the star shuttle could bring people back and forth to their jobs. Let’s make it more than just stops at the next entertainment establishment. But I have to be real here, cars are everywhere. It seems everyone gets one when they turn 16 and there are a hell of a lot of people. They are the plague. They are the dangerous weapons and becoming more dangerous by day with idiots texting and celling while they drive. To compound the problem I’m not sure that very many of these drivers even know how to drive all that well.
How can we say let’s ban cars from downtown and not from our neighborhoods? My neighborhood of Park Street, Laurel, Park Terrace and Parkville has mucho mucho cars. Every neighborhood in the city has the same problem.
Now here is the tricky one. The large businesses downtown. This group has already heard from Anne I. Hayes (President of the Central Connecticut Bicycle Alliance and Director of Parking and Mass Transit at The Travelers), and her recommendations. Again I can’t speak to all that she said or where she comes down in all of this. I would presume that one would have to present a real WHY to the employer’s downtown and they would have to be in on the discussions. (Goes back to the people which even if some of us cringe that’s a part of the reality.)
I don’t believe that it would be more expensive for employees to take the bus rather than drive their car to work. My bus pass is $45.00 a month, unlimited rides. I can go to Middletown, Manchester and use my pass in New Haven and any city in Ct. Other fares can be found at the Ct. Transit Site. I can only gather that most of the fares from the different zones are a real bargain. Most large employers give discounts on monthly bus passes, Ct. Transit guarantees rides home or to your car for emergencies, tax benefits of $400.00 annually on federal and state taxes and the uplift of knowing that you are not adding to the problem of congestion and impacting the environment so little Sassy can breath and coughs and chokes to death. The large employee’s downtown are already on board with some of the items discussed.
Sure to achieve some of the ideas brought up at the meeting will take old fashion hard work and a lot of it. But when we look out our window we see that something must be done. Perhaps we should start before we are forced to do something.
I would love to hear from other readers of this blog who attended the meeting. Me I am a non-driver who detests everything about cars so my perspective is rather skewed.
Matt Ritter
Kerri- thanks for posting this. Just FYI- there will be more meetings/discussions in the new year as well. There will also likely be a joint meeting of the Council’s Planning & Economic Development Committee and Planning and Zoning Commission.